PLEASE CLICK ON DOWNLOAD
On the 5th anniversary of the healthcare ruling, President Donald Trump announced that there was a big surprise coming in the near future.
"Healthcare is working along very well. We could have a big surprise with a great health-care package."
"I said you're gonna have a great, great surprise. It's gonna be great!"
THE BIG SUPRPRISE IS PAM BONDI WON THE HEALTHCARE LAWSUIT!
Pam Bondi won the healthcare lawsuit, and The Gospel of Gun Rights was written to explain how she won. Please read her congratulatory letter below. As a result of her victory, the following laws were made unconstitutional:
1. The Gun Control Act and all laws that prohibit the right to own a gun.
2. All executive orders on gun control.
3. All personal and business income taxes.
4. The healthcare tax.
5. All voter restriction laws.
6. The Johnson Amendment.
In the summer of 2012, Congress and the DOJ played the ultimate game of constitutional poker, and the stakes couldn't have been any higher. At the time, no one realized that Congress stood to lose its most coveted powers if it failed in its attempt to command Americans to buy health insurance. Congress failed, and as a result, the American people scored some major victories. Thanks to the healthcare ruling, the right to buy and own a gun can never be taken away. Maybe this was why Chief Justice John Roberts was smiling after his ruling.
Justice Roberts placed Congress, the Senate and the federal courts in checkmate, and now it's time to demand action. We strongly urge all Americans to contact their representatives and demand that they read The Gospel of Gun Rights. This publication is free for all to read. From this point on, our representatives have no excuse for not working with President Trump on healthcare reform and tax reform.
Please feel free to contact the White House and give your opinion of The Gospel of Gun Rights. Also, please feel free to express your opinion to President Trump on Twitter. You know that he loves Twitter!
Congress is now compelled to act on healthcare reform and tax reform, and with your help, not only will we make America great again - we will make her greater than ever before. Thank you, and may God bless America.
State of Florida
CONGRATULATORY LETTER TO PAM BONDI
[To be sent to Pam Bondi on October 15, 2017]
To the Attorney General of the State of Florida Pam Bondi,
I would like to inform you that you won National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. Chief Justice John Roberts struck down the individual health insurance mandate as both a command and a tax when he ruled that Congress could not compel commerce.
The healthcare tax is unconstitutional under the Court's order against compelling commerce. The Court never understood that Congress could have enforced the individual mandate by simply creating a universal excise on all health insurance policies and commanding that Americans pay the excise. This method of taxation would have implemented the mandate as both a command and a tax.
The Commerce Clause prevents the healthcare tax from being collected. Sebelius said, "The Court today holds that our Constitution protects us from federal regulation under the Commerce Clause so long as we abstain from the regulated activity." Sebelius defined regulation as taxation since a lawful sale is regulated with a sales tax. Therefore, Congress can only tax Americans when they complete a sale and not when they abstain from a sale.
Like the healthcare tax, a sales tax on health insurance could have been imposed on Americans for not purchasing health insurance, and in fact, mandating the sale of health insurance with a tax on the sale of health insurance would have upheld the act that Congress attempted to mandate: the sale of health insurance. Simply put, if the individual mandate cannot be enforced with a direct sales tax, then it cannot be enforced with the healthcare tax.
You should also be aware that Sebelius prevents Congress from collecting all existing income taxes. The Constitution grants Congress the authority to lay and collect duties, imposts and excises, and it also requires that all direct taxes be apportioned. Sebelius and Pollock v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. defined duties, imposts and excises as sales taxes, and a sales tax cannot be apportioned in any way. As you know, Hylton v. United States gave Congress the authority to directly tax Americans without apportionment when it said that Congress could impose a direct tax and call it a duty, impost or excise. In Brushaber v. Union Pacific the Court used Hylton to uphold the first income tax in 1916, and now both rulings are unconstitutional under Sebelius. If Congress cannot compel commerce, then it cannot directly tax without apportionment.
A direct tax is a tax on the ownership of anything including the human body (capitation), and it is imposed by command from the government. An indirect tax, i.e., sales tax, is a tax on the sale of anything, and it is not imposed by command. Duties, imposts and excises are sales taxes, and therefore, above all other interpretations, "taxation without apportionment" means to impose a sales tax, and "direct taxation without apportionment" means to impose a sales tax as a direct tax.
The power to directly tax without apportionment is the power to compel a sale, because a sales tax only compels a sale if used as a direct tax. For example, if the Health Insurance Tax (HIT) was imposed as a direct tax, then Americans would be compelled to buy a Cadillac health insurance policy. Also, if the Fireams Ammunition Excise Tax was imposed as a direct tax, then the sale of a firearm or ammunition would be compelled.
An excise can only regulate a sale by making what is sold more expensive, and this is accomplished by adding the amount of the tax to the cost of what is sold. Brushaber said that an income tax is an excise, and under Sebelius, an excise can only be used one way to tax the sale of labor. First, its rate must be determined by the type of labor that is sold. In other words, the rate of the tax must be determined by a type of job rather than an income bracket. The rate of an excise cannot be determined by an income bracket, because income, i.e., legal tender, cannot be sold. Second, an excise on labor must always be added to the cost of labor, because this is the only way that it can regulate the sale of labor.
Under Sebelius, any excise on labor can only be used as a regulatory tax. It said, "But taxes that seek to influence conduct are nothing new. Some of our earliest federal taxes sought to deter the purchase of imported manufactured goods in order to foster growth of domestic industry. Today, federal and state taxes can compose more than half the retail price of cigarettes, not just to raise more money, but to encourage people to quit smoking. And we have upheld such obvious regulatory measures as taxes on selling marijuana and sawed-off shotguns. Indeed, 'every tax is in some measure regulatory. To some extent it interposes an economic impediment to the activity as compared with others not taxed.'" It also said, "Congress's use of the Taxing Clause to encourage buying something is, by contrast, not new", and "Congress may not for example, expand its power under the Taxing Clause."
The Sixteenth Amendment does not give Congress the authority to directly tax without apportionment, because it does not mention the term Direct Taxes. The Sixteenth Amendment only mentions taxation without apportionment, and this is why it does not grant any special taxing power beyond the Taxing Clause The Sixteenth Amendment only gives Congress the authority to impose sales taxes, and as a result, the Taxing Clause strictly prohibits the collection of all existing federal income taxes and withholding taxes. All income taxes on inheritance, capital gains, dividends, royalties, gambling and charitable donations must be apportioned since they are only direct taxes and not excises. They are not excises, because their payment does not produce a contract of sale.
Sebelius allows all free Americans to buy a gun, because it ruled that paying a tax is a lawful act. This means that no American can be penalized in any way for paying the Firearms Ammunition and Excise Tax or a state sales tax when a gun is purchased. Sebelius said, "We do not make light of the severe burden that taxation-especially taxation motivated by a regulatory purpose-can impose. But imposition of a tax nonetheless leaves an individual with a lawful choice to do or not do a certain act, so long as he is willing to pay a tax levied on that choice", and "Congress's authority under the taxing power is limited to requiring an individual to pay money into the Federal Treasury, no more. If a tax is properly paid, the Government has no power to compel or punish individuals subject to it." It also said, "In distinguishing penalties from taxes, this Court has explained that 'if the concept of penalty means anything, it means punishment for an unlawful act or omission.'"
This letter only scratches the surface with regards to the impact of Sebelius on our nation. The Gospel of Gun Rights discusses the issues in this letter in greater detail along with many others that were also affected. You should never be asked to aplogize for your effort, because you are the winner. Thanks to your hard work and dedication, our nation will not only become great again...it will become greater than ever before.